September 4, 2018 by Jeff Schnabel
New safety standards based on IEC 62368-1 are superseding existing standards worldwide. In a move that keeps things simple for product vendors, regulators in the US and EU have decided to harmonize the date the new standards will supplant the outgoing 60950-1 and 60065 standards. This harmonized date is now December 20, 2020, giving vendors a unified target to focus their regulation compliance efforts in two of the most important worldwide markets.
This positive development has come about as the EU has extended the date for "cessation of presumption of conformity" for existing products already tested in accordance with the old standards. This cessation was originally scheduled for June 20, 2019, although the date of withdrawal for EN 60950-1 and EN 60065 had been set for December 20, 2020. By consolidating these two events on the 2020 date, the EU can avoid allowing any unintended exceptions.
The situation is unambiguous now: on December 20, 2020, the old standards will be withdrawn, and any product covered by the scope of EN 62368-1 (the IEC standard as written into law by EU legislators) must be tested in accordance with that standard. Following the EU's announcement, the UL organization in the US confirmed it would move its own Effective Date for UL 62368-1 (the US version of IEC 62368-1) to supersede UL 60950-1 and UL 60065 (previously scheduled for June 20, 2019) to December 20, 2020.
Therefore, this is the date everything will change. And as the rule-makers have harmonized across the waters, OEMs get a little more time to put their new testing procedures and documentation in place.
The changeover to 62368-1 has been made necessary by the increasingly blurred distinction between ICT equipment covered by 60950-1, and AV equipment covered by 60065. All along, the standards bodies have been clear that 62368-1 is not intended to unify the preceding standards. The scope is the same, but the IEC technical committee responsible – TC108 – has used a substantially different standards-making philosophy that aims to create a less prescriptive, more future-proof document that helps create safer products for end users.
We have officially entered the era of Hazard-Based Safety Engineering (HBSE). This principle has become formalized over the last 20 years or so, and the IEC has been committed to it since at least 2002, when it handed over the newly published ECMA-287 Safety of Electronic Equipment standard to TC108's Hazard-Based Standard Development Team (HBSDT).
HBSE shifts the emphasis away from demonstrating that prescribed specifications have been met and requires product manufacturers to demonstrate that known hazards have been considered and the product has been designed to be safe to use in the expected context. However, despite being hazard-based, standards like 62368-1 do not require risk analysis in the same way as a standard like IEC 60601-1.
HBSE principles work to protect equipment users by identifying any potentially hazardous energy sources and the mechanisms by which the energy could transfer to a user, while proposing suitable means of preventing those transfers from happening. The scope includes normal operation and fault conditions. Safeguards are put in place to protect against pain or injury caused directly by electrical energy (electric shock) or thermal burn injury, and/or to prevent electrically caused fires that could result in pain, injury, death or property damage. Importantly, HBSE also measures the effectiveness of the safeguards.
Hazard and safeguard analyses are approached based on three-block models: ENERGY SOURCE - TRANSFER MECHANISM - BODY PART and ENERGY SOURCE - SAFEGUARD - BODY PART. These diagrams explain the idea more clearly:
In the 62368-1 standards, energy levels that the user could be exposed to are categorized as ES1, ES2, and ES3. ES1 is the lowest category, as described in the table. A similar rising scale is applied to analyzing electrical-fire hazards and means of prevention.
|Energy Source||Effect on the body||Effect on combustible materials|
|Class 1||Not painful, but may be detectable||Ignition not likely|
|Class 2||Painful, but not an injury||Ignition possible, but limited growth and spread of fire|
|Class 3||Injury||Ignition likely, rapid growth and spread of fire|
These energy levels help determine the safeguards that must be designed in. 62368-1 refers to several classes of safeguards from supplementary to reinforced, which encompass techniques like protective earthing, a fire-proof enclosure, insulation or others. There are also distinctions between levels of user competence, and here we can see some parallels with the outgoing standards: "Ordinary Person" in 62368-1 is equivalent to the User/Operator class in 60950-1/60065, while "Skilled Person" is equivalent to "Service Person". 62368-1 defines an additional class, "Instructed Person", which applies to users who have been trained or will be supervised by a Skilled Person.
How do all these hierarchies interact? A good example is that a double or reinforced safeguard (the highest level) is required to protect an ordinary person from a class 3 energy source (ES3).
It is important for product designers to recognize that the new standards apply not only to the end product, but also to major components and subsystems like power supplies. Right now, it is possible to source power supplies that are certified to either 62368-1, 60950-1, or 60065. IEC 62368-1 includes a clause (4.1.1) that allows 60950-1 or 60065 power supplies to be used in end products tested according to 62368-1, or power supplies certified to 62368-1 to be used in end products compliant with 60950-1 or 60065. However, whether this clause will remain valid after December 20, 2020 is still up in the air in the EU. The deletion of text in clause 4.1.1 failed a preliminary enquiry vote, but another round of voting is expected to take place. Because the situation remains unclear whether legacy 60950-1 and 60065 approvals will remain valid in Europe, CUI is working to transition its portfolio of power supplies to the latest 62368-1 2nd Edition standard, to minimize any re-testing burdens for customers who sell their products globally, come the big day.
New 62368-1 hazard-based safety standards are adopted already in the US/Canada and EU. While the older standards will be withdrawn on December 20, 2020 (in case you did not already know), there is no reason OEMs cannot test their new (or existing) products in accordance with the incoming standard right now. This is the best way to avoid being caught out on the date of withdrawal.
Although 62368-1 is intended to be less prescriptive, more flexible for designers, and ensure end users get safer products, the change to HBSE is a significant philosophical shift. As always, there is a lot of information to digest to ensure your products will comply, making now the time to engage, if you have not already. The new date gives a little more time to prepare, but it represents a hard exit for the old standards. To help support this transition, many of CUI's power supplies already carry the 62368-1 certification, with the goal to have the entire portfolio transitioned well before December 20, 2020.
Have comments regarding this post or topics that you would like to see us cover in the future?
Send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org